this is needed in order to not collide with the Efl.Text Interface.
Theoretically eolian should have ordered on that, however, the checks
are buggy and only work out of tree.
ref T8648
Details
Details
- Reviewers
zmike segfaultxavi - Maniphest Tasks
- T8648: eo files inconsistent
- Commits
- rEFL8a155aecb6c9: efl_text_formatter: rename from Efl.Text.Formatter to Efl.Text_Formatter
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rEFL core/efl
- Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable. - Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.
Comment Actions
Not much to discuss here, I think, but I'll bring @ali.alzyod since this is his creation.
Comment Actions
My comment is :
Are there anyway, to collect all these classes like (cursor,enums,textfomater,...) in new namespace, instead of adding them directly in EFL namespace ?
Comment Actions
All the Input_Text classes are in the Efl.Input_Text namespace.
Cursor methods have been moved to the Efl.Text_Cursor namespace.
Text.Formatter has been moved to the root namespace as Efl.Text_Formatter. I agree it looks weird, but this whole class is weird, as we discussed some time ago...
I think adding another namespace would make things too verbose, and except the formatter class, the others don't look that bad.