Honestly I do not get what "Currently growbuf == outbuf is out of date." is. Do you mean that the outbuf is out of date, because it is same with growbuf? And is that for the first case that the outbuf is not dirty?

Update comment.

In D9085#166912, @Hermet wrote:

And It's very suspicious at this condition.

1288 if ((inbuf != outbuf) && out->dirty)

This condition might be related with this issue... Something make it out of the condition ...

Use a temp buffer on grow_add side as well to reduce calling blend_add based on
valuable hermet's comment.

Let me know more about 'map object'. Does it mean the object using Evas_Map such as button of evas_object_map_set(button, map)?

Use correct name blendcmd instead of curvecmd

It would be better if we have enhanced documentation and related TC as well. Thank you.

Enhanced based on comment. This is much more neat!

Update based on comment.

Update based on comment.

Remove unintended lines.

Update based on comments.

In D8892#162737, @Hermet wrote:

1. I've considered for the interface, how about using align_hint ?

If the "using align_hint" means kind of "using Efl.Gfx.Hint.hint_align", it could be more flexible than using these enums. But it seems that you did not mean Efl.Gfx.Hint.hint_align because this is hint on how to align an object inside its container.

Remove unrelated changes

Update based on a comment saying make it simpler

fix typo

+1024

The warning probably comes from

@bu5hm4n
(1) Are you using gl engine?
(2) What is the result of eina_btlog?
(3) The result would be not caused by incorrect example.

(Oooops... sorry...) Warnings are removed.

sorry, this is a change to test arc

Remove unnecessary changes

Amend based on comments

Um... no details?

Amend based on comments

Add this to the meson build file

I cannot close this revision because I could not change status to 'accepted'
But it was possible 'git push' this change. Probably @segfaultxavi needs to accept this.

In D7344#157863, @bu5hm4n wrote:

(Requesting changes here for hermet, so its out of the loop.)

A correct way(https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8618) is coming

The following is commit message. This could explain more about the issue.

@shilpasingh is it not possible to add test case to efl/src/tests/elementary/efl_ui_test_atspi.c ?

I would like to merge this soon. The test case could be added by separated patch set (@bu5hm4n)

+1

Rebase

Remove change not related to use of TO_INT_ROUND.

"bring to front"
"send to back"
which is same with EVIL's PowerPoint.
Please never mind. :-P

If final value is calculated by TO_INT_ROUND, then make _edje_part_pixel_adjust
use TO_INT_ROUND for eval value as well.

Fix one more incorrect calculation.
The _edje_part_pixel_adjust could change final.w(h) value to -1.
This value is using in the _edje_part_recalc_single_rel, and has caused
incorrect position.

+2

IMO i18n (https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7506) and l10n of EFL correspond with https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-i18n
Now I have got difference between i18n and l10n. Thank you.

Interesting :D

I would like to want to know why eo needs 'the ability to get the size of object of a certain class' ?

+2048

Handle potential side effect

+1

I am sorry there would be a small typo.

No doubt

This is not standing for the cache2. I just quoted comment of the cache2.
This is standing for the cache.

Follow naming convention.

Update map geometry on correct place.