User Details
- User Since
- Feb 15 2013, 4:22 AM (313 w, 6 d)
- Availability
- Available
Fri, Feb 15
@woohyun
As a part of T7653 this interface can be removed completely and moved into efl_access_object. Additionally events can be refactored into regular methods, so instead of "window,created" we will have something like window_created_emit method or just emit with some parameter. Is this acceptable?
Mon, Feb 11
Currentrly, Efl.Pack extends Efl.Container.
And Efl.Pack includes "unpack" which seems almost similar with "content_remove".
I also think this does not have any problem. Let's move this to "Stabilized". :)
Sat, Feb 9
Plus, I'm not sure why this is separated with efl_access_widget_action.eo.
elm_actions_get(of efl.access.widget.action) returns "Efl_Access_Action_Data * ",
and actions_get(of efl.access.action) returns "Eina_List * " of action names....
Those are special set of events for efl_access_object_event_emit.
And the method looks ... static one. (i.e. not a method for a specific object)
Fri, Feb 8
I don't think efl_ui_layout_part is needed anymore because it is just the same with efl_ui_widget_part now.
Do we have any problem after removing it ?
Wed, Feb 6
Currently, only "Efl.Ui.Widget" and "Efl.Ui.Layout_Part" are implementing this interface.
If @cedric @felipealmeida , and @SanghyeonLee don't have any objection on this definition, I think there would be no problem.
If @cedric @felipealmeida , and @SanghyeonLee don't have any objection on this definition, I think there would be no problem.
Thu, Jan 31
Wed, Jan 30
Then, why are we handling legacy things now ?
One question.
Do we need to handle legacy eo files (for example, elm_xxx.eo, evas_xxx.eo, and so on) now - even those will not be bind to other languages ?
Tue, Jan 29
I think this interface looks good, but I'm not sure whether we need to support edje features in efl_ui_image.eo.
I think this interface looks good, but I'm not sure whether we need to support edje features in efl_ui_image.eo.
I think this interface looks good, but I'm not sure whether we need to support edje features in efl_ui_image.eo.
Mon, Jan 28
I think Efl.Ui.Factory needs to include "create", "release" (and "created" event), and "model_connect" needs to be included to another interface (or class).
I've heard from @SanghyeonLee that MVVM related things are still in changing, so please check this task together :)
Update elm_code_widget_text.c to free allocated memory
update commit message
Change the commit message
Fri, Jan 25
Remove efl.io.* implementing from efl_app
Thu, Jan 24
Could you check if this task is ok with following patch (D7747) ?
https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7747
Wed, Jan 23
Thanks for giving an answer.
#1 As you described in T7514 like :
reading and writing to the task is feeling a bit weird, and is not really documented what it is supposed to to, in efl_app this is writing to the console, which is a lot complexer with c#&efl.io.writer, than a simpler Console.PrintLine("asfd")
Tue, Jan 22
I'm wondering how we will handle this unimplemented things.
What I can only think is that separating interface properly if those are not something that have plan to be implemented soon.
(Or removing some interfaces if necessary from the class)
Jan 17 2019
Jan 16 2019
Do you have any plan to auto-remove a duplicated word between @legacy_prefix and @property name ?
Jan 15 2019
Today, I can get following errors when push "quit" button.
(of course, you need some changes on the example codes to avoid build errors)
(I executed the sample with "mono")
Jan 14 2019
I think we can make a list of constants + enums in EFL. And then, let's think which are needed to be set as global.
Jan 11 2019
Jan 9 2019
I've added @protected and @beta in the description for better understanding.
Jan 8 2019
I know you are very busy, but -
please care about this problem together :)
Dec 30 2018
Some of above classes include lots of definitions it them.
For instance, "Efl.Ui.Widget" and "Efl.Canvas.Object".
Dec 25 2018
I'm wondering the goal of this task.
Is this task to manage commits something like https://phab.enlightenment.org/rEFLbbbdfbecc4ecafc25841fc1b36d82916f5db6e0e ?
ping ? Could you check above question ?
@larryolj
ping ? Could you check above question ?
Dec 7 2018
Could you check this task ? I also agree with JackDaniel.
Dec 6 2018
Could you share the progress of this work ?
Do we have a way something like ...
I think customizing for Tizen could be discussed privately.
Except that, what are left for this task ?
Nov 22 2018
Nov 16 2018
@cedric welcome back :)
@Jaehyun_Cho
Oct 28 2018
I also agree with @lauromoura that we don't need to wait for the works of @lauromoura.
Eo class inheritance refactoring should be done independently with his C# binding works.
Oct 19 2018
I agree with the opinion of @bu5hm4n if the way that can make you happy can not be realized soon.
If you have some idea about how to fix (or improve) the bad construrctor system, could you share your idea here ?
Oct 16 2018
Oct 11 2018
Oct 5 2018
Please check inline comment ~
Oct 4 2018
Oct 2 2018
Could you explain how to check the results for automated test cases In devs/felipealmeida/tct ?
Sep 18 2018
@felipealmeida
We only need to include the methods which are "implemented" by the specific class.
That is, we don't need to include the method "not implemented".
Sep 10 2018
@felipealmeida
Could you take care of the case of "efl.ui.Button should be changed to Efl.Ui.Button" together ?
Plus, will you update this to the master branch directly ?
Or, if you are managing another branch for this work, please share the branch name.
May 8 2018
May 2 2018
Please give a feedback whether to keep this patch or not.
I think we already have another way to communicate for this subject.
Could you give a feedback on this ?
This was a prototyping of new theme for efl_ui_xxx. And I can abandon this because it's already applied by @singh.amitesh.
Could you give a dicision whether to keep this patch or not ?
@eunue
Could you abandon this patch ?
Apr 23 2018
Apr 12 2018
I hope this patch would be updated together with new patch which introduces new MBE class.
Apr 11 2018
@cedric
Oh. ok :) Then, everything is good.
Apr 10 2018
This work includes simplify efl_ui_slider (it includes too much feature inside as a default slider class).
Could you explain why this thing should not be applied on master ?
I've added some inline comments.